MINUTES OF MEETING

                                          PORT OF THE ISLANDS

                            COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

 

            The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Port of the Islands Community Improvement District was held Friday, April 19, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. at the Egret Room, 25000 Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida.

            Present and constituting a quorum were:

 

            Richard Gatti                                         Chairman

            Bernard Wolsky                                    Supervisor

            Ted Bissell                                              Supervisor

            John Robinson                                       Supervisor

            Richard Burgeson                                 Supervisor

 

            Also present were:

 

            Darrin Mossing                                     District Assistant Manager

            Daniel Cox                                              District Counsel

            Ronald Benson                                      District Engineer

            Numerous residents

 

            The following is a summary of the actions taken at the April 19, 2002 meeting.  A copy of the tape recording of the meeting is on file at the District office.

 

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS             Roll Call

            Mr. Gatti called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.  Mr. Mossing called the roll.

 

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS         Approval of the Minutes of the March 7, and March 15, 2002 Meetings

 

ON MOTION by Mr. Wolsky, seconded by Mr. Bissell, with all in favor, the minutes of the March 7, 2002 and March 15, 2002 meetings were approved.

 

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS            Approval of Termination of Easements for Lots 53 and 54, Port of the Islands, Phase II

            Mr. Cox stated the owner of these two lots is going to add an addition to their house that would encroach upon the easement area.  Once they do that, they are not going to be able to sell that second lot to anyone anyway.  The reason we have these interior easements is to provide the services to the two adjacent lots.

            Mr. Benson has looked at this particular easement area, and we have no improvements in that area at this time.  We would be able to serve the lot that still remains on the other side of the property with the perimeter easements that exist on those two lots.

            Mr. Gatti asked is this between the two lots?

            Mr. Cox responded yes, it is between the two.

            Mr. Benson stated they are the single owner of the two lots.

            Mr. Gatti asked what about the stormwater; no problem?

            Mr. Benson responded no.

            Mr. Bissell asked they will only pay one water and sewer though?

            Mr. Cox responded no, they will continue to be assessed as two lots.

 

ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Wolsky, with all in favor, the termination of easements for Lots 53 and 54, Port of the Islands, Phase II was approved.

 

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS        Consideration of Award of Contract for Irrigation/Reuse System Project

            Mr. Benson stated we rebid this project earlier this week.  If you recall, last month we had accepted bids and the low bid was $222,700, with the engineer's estimate of $195,650.  It was rebid and the bid that you have before you is for $185,687.50, which is $10,000 less than the engineer's estimate.  It is about $37,000 less that the bid you received last month.

            Mr. Gatti asked not to be picky, but what was the second low bidder last month?

            Mr. Benson responded the second low bid was $222,941.50.  We had one bid that was non-responsive.

            Mr. Gatti stated in essence, we saved $35,000.

            Mr. Benson stated yes.  We have reviewed the references for this bidder and also know the bidder.  They do good work.  There is a bid bond.  Everything appears to be in order.  We recommend that you award the contract to Kyle Construction. 

            If you recall, originally I told you it was going to be somewhere between $150,000 and $200,000.  We received a grant from Big Cypress Basin and South Florida Water Management District for $75,000, provided that we spend at least $150,000.  We do have $75,000 towards this.

            Mr. Mossing stated we will have to tell you where the rest of the money in the budget is.  I think we were planning for $150,000 originally in the budget.

            Next month we will start our budget process.  We will take a close look at our cash flow and where we are at.  We may need to utilize some reserve funds to complete that, and we may need to consider some type of rate increase for our utilities to replenish those funds over the next couple of years.

            Mr. Gatti stated this is not the appropriate forum for this discussion, but the idea of using reclaimed/reuse water is an absolute must, the way South Florida Water utilization is going, and the way South Florida is looking at redistribution.  When does our redistribution come up - our allocation of water?

            Mr. Benson responded we are currently in an extension, actually, not a renewal.  At some point in time they will ask us to renew.

            Mr. Gatti stated the fact that we are using reuse water for irrigation and not using potable water for irrigation, builds a very good case for our water allocation in the future.  This is a very good move, even if it costs us some money and even if we have to make an investment at this point.

            Maybe not in our lifetime, but in the foreseeable future, we will be seeing closed loop systems where not only will this be used for irrigation, but it will be used for potable water, too.  I would strongly recommend the program.

            Mr. Wolsky asked we have until December to complete it?

            Mr. Benson responded that is correct.

            Mr. Wolsky stated it will take three months to build, approximately.

            Mr. Benson stated let me give you an update on the permit.  We have contacted DEP.  Our understanding is they have all the information they need.  The person who is writing the permit is on vacation.  Hopefully, when they are back, that will be one of their high priority projects to finish our permit.

            Mr. Gatti asked can we start work without the permit?

            Mr. Benson responded no, I would not advise that.

            Mr. Gatti asked can we put the pipe in the ground without it connecting, without the permit?

            Mr. Benson responded we could potentially do that if we needed to meet the terms of our agreement.

            Mr. Gatti stated we are going to want to beat the rain.  Because, that is what these prices are predicated on.

            Mr. Benson stated the contract does have a provision that allows us to not give the notice to proceed immediately upon award.  You are right, it may only make sense to do the construction earlier than later.  When this fellow gets back from vacation we will talk to him and see what we can do.

            Mr. Bissell asked they verbally gave you approval on this permit?

            Mr. Benson responded that is from talking to people, yes.  There have been some technicalities.  In actuality, DEP on this type of thing is not used to dealing with systems as small as ours.  We are trying to get them not to hold us to every single requirement that they would hold Collier County to, for a very large system, as long as we are protecting the public.  That is just going to save us money.

            A Supervisor asked does the contractor acknowledge that we have not received the permit yet?

            Mr. Benson responded yes, and we have a 90/120 day period to give the notice to proceed.  We do not have to start this contractor until we have that.  We will not do anything that is not legitimate, as far as having someone start work without a permit.  What Mr. Gatti was asking was is there a way to get another permit just for the pipe, instead of the whole project.

            Mr. Gatti stated a dry pipe permit.

 

ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Wolsky, with all in favor the contract for the irrigation reuse system was awarded to Kyle Construction in the amount of their low bid of $185,687.50.

 

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS            Staff Reports

          A.      Attorney

            Mr. Cox stated the reason I did not schedule the executive session is that we have to actually hold that in a public meeting like this one.  There are very limited reasons for which that meeting can be held.  Actually, just a status update would not qualify for that anyway.

            Basically, the case is it is still on hold.  We have filed our answer, and so have several property owners individually.  Allstate, of course, has filed their answer.  We have raised several affirmative defenses, they are called. 

            The case management conference is scheduled for May 9th, which is probably when the Judge will give us more direction as to when we can begin and when discovery must end, and when we have to file a memorandum with the Court that identifies the issues to be resolved and what attempts were made to resolve those without the Court's involvement.  We will then be on track to be scheduled for our hearings, and I would think that the Judge is going to try to wrap this up this year.

            Mr. Wolsky stated when we first went into this case, you asked everybody to maintain quiet while the case was proceeding - not to grant any interviews, et cetera.  Was that not the case?

            Mr. Cox responded I do not recall.  It may be very well that I did.  Up until the point we file our answer is really when it is critical.

            Mr. Gatti stated I am going to cut you off, please.  If we are going to talk about this case, we are going to go into an executive session.  I do not want to go into it in an open meeting.  I appreciate your update.  Is that appropriate?

            Mr. Cox stated yes, and I do not mind finishing answering that question, because I will not get into the details of the case.

            Mr. Gatti stated I cut it off, so let us leave it cut off.  Anything else?

            Mr. Cox stated Mr. Benson brought up the subject the other day that we had not received the notice to bid on the surplus pump from the County.  We checked into that, and their records show that they sent out the notice to bid to about 15 people, including my office, but I do not find it anywhere in my files.   The sum of it is that nobody bid on the pump. It is still sitting there.  Looking at the statute, I do not see what happens if no one bids.  Then we get back to the statute that says that the County can dispose of surplus property to an entity such as a Community Development District for nominal consideration or no consideration.  Therefore, we are back to that point of approaching them and asking them to just donate it to us.

            Mr. Gatti stated I suggest we approach our Commissioner, because he is looking to help us. 

            Mr. Cox stated for them to donate it under that statute, it requires the Board of County Commissioners' approval, so we would have to talk to each of the Commissioners anyway at some point to let them know what is going on.  It would probably get placed on the consent agenda, and not even be an issue.

            Mr. Gatti asked should we initiate a request of some sort?

            Mr. Cox responded yes, we will do that.

            Mr. Wolsky stated I can send him an E-mail.

            Mr. Cox stated it would help.  If you want to send him and E-mail, but I will reinitiate the request that we made originally that they donate it to us, or set some nominal consideration.

            Mr. Benson stated yesterday I talked to the project manager for Collier County on the project where this is being surplused and told this woman that Port of the Islands - she has always known we wanted it - I said, we want it.  We did not get the notice.  That is why we did not bid.  Do not do anything with this.  Do not just junk it, because we do want it.

 

          B.      Engineer

            Mr. Benson stated at the request of the Board a few months ago we started building the map of the infrastructure in the community. 

            Mr. Benson outlined the elements contained on the map and gave a brief report on the pumps.

 

          C.      Manager

            There being none, the next agenda item was addressed.

 

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS            Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments

            Mr. Lauffer stated I want to congratulate Mr. Robinson taking care of the water leak that has been going on for two or three months.  It probably amounts to three or four thousand gallons a month.

 

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS      Approval of Invoices and Financial Statements

            Mr. Bissell stated after my discussion with Mr. Mossing here, I recommend that we pay the bills as presented.

 

ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Wolsky, with all in favor, the invoices and financial statements were approved.

 

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS         Adjournment

 

ON MOTION by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Burgeson, with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                        

Darrin Mossing                                                       Richard Gatti

Assistant Secretary                                                Chairman